↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of ultrasonic activation of NaOCl and orange oil in removing filling material from mesial canals of mandibular molars with and without isthmus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of ultrasonic activation of NaOCl and orange oil in removing filling material from mesial canals of mandibular molars with and without isthmus
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1590/1678-775720150090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirela Sangoi Barreto, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa, Manuela Favarin Santini, Bruno Cavalini Cavenago, Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte, Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier, Marcos Vinícius Reis Só

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the volume of remaining filling material after passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and orange oil in mesial canals of mandibular molars, with and without isthmus. Material and Methods Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were divided according to the presence or absence of isthmus. Canals were prepared and filled (Micro-CT #1). Filling was removed using rotary instruments, and specimens were sub-divided into three groups according to the irrigation procedures: Conventional - conventional irrigation with NaOCl, PUI/NaOCl - PUI of NaOCl (three activations, 20 seconds each), and PUI/orange oil - PUI of orange oil (Micro-CT#2). Specimens were enlarged using the X2 and X3 ProTaper Next instruments and submitted to the same irrigation protocols (Micro-CT #3). Results No differences were found between the experimental groups in each stage of assessment (P>0.05). The volume of residual filling material was similar to that in Micro-CT #2 and Micro-CT #3, but lower than that observed in Micro-CT #1 (P<0.05). When groups were pooled according to the presence or absence of an isthmus, volume of residual filling material was higher in specimens presenting isthmus (P<0.05). Conclusions PUI of NaOCl or orange oil did not improve filling removal. Isthmus consists in an anatomical obstacle that impairs the removal of filling material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 27 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 30 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#496
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,536
of 275,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.