↓ Skip to main content

Occlusal changes secondary to temporomandibular joint conditions: a critical review and implications for clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occlusal changes secondary to temporomandibular joint conditions: a critical review and implications for clinical practice
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1678-775720150295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Waleska Caldas, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Guilherme Janson, Paulo César Rodrigues Conti

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the most commonly occlusal changes secondary to TMD. The clinical presentation of these conditions is discussed. Details regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients presenting TMD prior or during treatment are also presented. All plans for irreversible therapy should be preceded by a meticulous analysis of TMD signs and symptoms in such a way that patients are not submitted to irreversible treatment, based on an untrue occlusal relationship, secondary to articular and/or muscular disorders. When present, TMD symptoms must always be controlled to reestablish a "normal" occlusion and allow proper treatment strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 28 17%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 9 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 42 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 61%
Unspecified 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,836,279
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#179
of 598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,039
of 400,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.