↓ Skip to main content

Who watches the watchmen? How to avoid that valuable use of anti-plagiarism tools shift into a witch-hunt

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Who watches the watchmen? How to avoid that valuable use of anti-plagiarism tools shift into a witch-hunt
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/1678-77572015ed003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Pompermaier Garlet, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 56%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Computer Science 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#168
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,897
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.