You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human DNA extraction from whole saliva that was fresh or stored for 3, 6 or 12 months using five different protocols
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-77572016-0046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thais Francini Garbieri, Daniel Thomas Brozoski, Thiago José Dionísio, Carlos Ferreira Santos, Lucimara Teixeira das Neves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 87 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,275,789
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#9
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,671
of 426,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.