You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local food: benefits and failings due to modern agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientia Agricola, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-992x-2015-0439 |
| Authors |
Fábio Cunha Coelho, Enilce Maria Coelho, Monika Egerer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 66 | 26% |
| Unknown | 92 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#775,244
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,776
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them