↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of bond strength of silorane and methacrylate based restorative systems to dentin using different cavity models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of bond strength of silorane and methacrylate based restorative systems to dentin using different cavity models
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2013
DOI 10.1590/1679-775720130120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephano Zerlottini Isaac, Ana Claudia Pietrobom Bergamin, Cecília Pedroso Turssi, Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of two different restorative systems: silorane-based (P90), and methacrylate-based (P60), using two cavity models.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#271
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,571
of 212,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.