You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1806-3713/e20180058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Carolina Otoni Oliveira, Daiane Menezes Lorena, Lívia Corrêa Gomes, Bianca Lorrane Reges Amaral, Márcia Souza Volpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,230,090
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#237
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,890
of 447,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.