You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1806-9282.20210087 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jocassia Silva Pinheiro, André Pontes-Silva, Gabriel Gardhel Costa Araujo, Letícia Padilha Mendes, Flávio de Oliveira Pires, Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho |
| Abstract |
The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#16,059,145
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#332
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,198
of 440,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.