↓ Skip to main content

Profile of cystic fibrosis in two reference centers in southern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Profile of cystic fibrosis in two reference centers in southern Brazil
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.61.02.150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laís Cristina Rizzo, Gilberto Bueno Fischer, Paulo José Cauduro Maróstica, Helena Teresinha Mocelin

Abstract

to compare the characteristics of cystic fibrosis patients treated in two reference centers in southern Brazil in order to observe trends in the treatment and clinical outcomes that may produce changes in clinical conduct. cross-sectional, retrospective study with 83 patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, aged one month to eighteen years. The variables analyzed were obtained through review of medical records, including: demographic and clinical characteristics, socioeconomic status, pulmonary function test, bacterial colonization profile, medication and physiotherapy. between the two centers there was significant difference in the variables, including admissions in the previous year (p<0.001), lifetime hospital admissions (p<0.001), use of Dornase alpha (p=0.003) and inhaled antibiotic therapy (p=0.006), which were higher at the Santo Antônio Children's Hospital (HCSA), while age at first colonization with Staphylococcus aureus (p=0.008), maternal age (p=0.030), clinical score (p=0.001), socioeconomic score (p=0.021) and use of hypertonic saline (p<0.001) were lower at HCSA compared to São Lucas Hospital (HSL). the study centers seem to receive a different population of patients, both in socioeconomic terms, as well as disease severity, which interferes with the choice of medication treatment. At the HCSA, preventive actions against infection due to the high incidence of Burkholderia cepacia Complex and careful research into early lung changes will be encouraged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#807
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,603
of 279,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.