↓ Skip to main content

Folic acid and diseases - supplement it or not?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Folic acid and diseases - supplement it or not?
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, February 2016
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.62.01.90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siaw-Cheok Liew

Abstract

folic acid is a water soluble vitamin, which is synthetically-produced and found in fortified foods and supplements. Folate is found naturally in plants, such as the dark green leafy vegetables. Folate is not synthesizedde novo by humans, therefore the daily requirements are met from the dietary intake of folic acid supplements or food rich in this vitamin. Folate deficiency could lead to numerous common health problems. Hyperhomocysteinemia and the possibility of malignancy developments are the long term consequences of this deficit albeit contradictory findings on these claims. the articles included in this review focused on recent updated evidence-based reports and meta-analyses on the associations of the serum folate/folic acid and the various diseases found globally. the benefit of folic acid supplementation in the pre-conception period for the prevention of neural tube defects (NTDs) was well established and it was suggested that counseling sessions should be given to women with previous pregnancies affected by NTDs. However, supplementation of folic acid and its medicinal effects in the treatment of other diseases were contradictory and unclear. more detailed investigations into the health benefits of folic acid are needed before it could be recommended for supplementation, treatment or prevention of some of the diseases discussed in this review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 18%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 4%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 100 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Chemistry 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 106 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,409,185
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#405
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,181
of 407,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.