↓ Skip to main content

Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, September 2016
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.62.06.568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Franco Rizzo Komatsu, Edna Maria de Albuquerque Diniz, Alexandre Archanjo Ferraro, Maria Esther Jurvest Rivero Ceccon, Flávio Adolfo Costa Vaz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 29 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 34 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#150
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,990
of 338,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.