You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interpreting waterfalls as pockets of histories of Indigenous groups from the South-American Lowlands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de História, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/1806-93472017v37n75-02a |
Authors |
Fernando Ozorio de Almeida, Thiago Kater |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 39% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,370,994
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de História
#32
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,813
of 324,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de História
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them