You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Yield gap in cowpea plants as function of water déficits during reproductive stage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n6p372-378 |
| Authors |
Paulo J. O. P. Souza, Vivian D. da S. Farias, João V. N. Pinto, Hildo G. G. C. Nunes, Everaldo B. de Souza, Clyde W. Fraisse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental
#8
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,455
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them