↓ Skip to main content

Trends in restorative composites research: what is in the future?

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in restorative composites research: what is in the future?
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariel Soeiro Maas, Yvette Alania, Livia Camargo Natale, Marcela Charantola Rodrigues, David Christopher Watts, Roberto Ruggiero Braga

Abstract

Clinical trials have identified secondary caries and bulk fracture as the main causes for composite restoration failure. As a measure to avoid frequent reinterventions for restoration replacement, composites with some sort of defense mechanism against biofilm formation and demineralization, as well as materials with lower susceptibility to crack propagation are necessary. Also, the restorative procedure with composites are very time-consuming and technically demanding, particularly concerning the application of the adhesive system. Therefore, together with bulk-fill composites, self-adhesive restorative composites could reduce operator error and chairside time. This literature review describes the current stage of development of remineralizing, antibacterial and self-healing composites. Also, an overview of the research on fiber-reinforced composites and self-adhesive composites, both introduced for clinical use in recent years, is presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 66 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 43%
Engineering 9 5%
Chemistry 6 3%
Materials Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 70 40%