You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Oral Research, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas Hian da Silva, Erick de Lima, Ranulfo Benedito de Paula Miranda, Stéphanie Soares Favero, Ulrich Lohbauer, Paulo Francisco Cesar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 536 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 77 | 14% |
| Unknown | 213 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 214 | 40% |
| Materials Science | 32 | 6% |
| Engineering | 22 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Unknown | 225 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,416,577
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#17
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,521
of 324,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them