↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the association of bruxism, psychosocial and sociodemographic factors in preschoolers

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the association of bruxism, psychosocial and sociodemographic factors in preschoolers
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monalisa Cesarino Gomes, Érick Tássio Neves, Matheus França Perazzo, Emilly Gabrielle Carlos de Souza, Júnia Maria Serra-Negra, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate factors associated with sleep bruxism in five-year-old preschool children. A preschool-based cross-sectional study was conducted with 761 pairs of children and their parents/caregivers. Sleep bruxism was diagnosed using a questionnaire administered to the parents/caregivers, who also answered questionnaires addressing sociodemographic data and parent's/caregiver's sense of coherence. Clinical oral evaluations of the children to determine dental caries, traumatic dental injuries, malocclusion and tooth wear were performed by two researchers who had undergone a training exercise (interexaminer Kappa: 0.70 to 0.91; intraexaminer Kappa: 0.81 to 1.00). Descriptive analysis and logistic regression for complex samples were carried out (α = 5%). The prevalence of sleep bruxism among the preschool children was 26.9%. The multivariate analysis revealed that bruxism was associated with poor sleep quality (OR = 2.93; 95 CI: 1.52-5.65) and tooth wear (OR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.39-3.96). In the present study, sleep bruxism among preschool children was associated with tooth wear and poor sleep quality of the child. In contrast, psychosocial aspects (sense of coherence) were not associated with sleep bruxism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 74 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 80 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#195
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,156
of 445,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.