↓ Skip to main content

Management of deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Kerber Tedesco, Thais Marchezini Reis, Anna Carolina Volpi Mello-Moura, Gabriela Seabra da Silva, Samanta Scarpini, Isabela Floriano, Thais Gimenez, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Daniela Prócida Raggio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 51 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 49 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#195
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,046
of 519,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.