You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CRESCIMENTO E FENOLOGIA DE ARAÇÁ-PERA (PSIDIUM ACUTANGULUM DC)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Amazonica, September 1992
|
DOI | 10.1590/1809-43921992223293 |
Authors |
Martha de Aguiar Falcão, Sidney Alberto do Ν Ferreira, Charles Roland Clement, Tereza Cristina Τ. dos Santos, Rosana de Medeiros Souza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 50% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 20% |
Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Acta Amazonica
#64
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,137
of 17,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Amazonica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.