↓ Skip to main content

Long bone fractures in Cerdocyon thous: macroscopic and microstructural evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Animal Brasileira, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long bone fractures in Cerdocyon thous: macroscopic and microstructural evaluation
Published in
Ciência Animal Brasileira, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/1809-6891v22e-67749
Authors

Felipe Martins Pastor, Gabriela de Oliveira Resende, Júlio Francisco Valiati Marin, Louisiane de Carvalho Nunes, Guilherme Galhardo Franco, Jankerle Neves Boeloni, Maria Aparecida da Silva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Animal Brasileira
#6
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,531
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Animal Brasileira
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.