↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiological and anatomopathological findings of type 1 and 2 abomasum ulcers in cattle with different comorbidities

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Animal Brasileira, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiological and anatomopathological findings of type 1 and 2 abomasum ulcers in cattle with different comorbidities
Published in
Ciência Animal Brasileira, January 2023
DOI 10.1590/1809-6891v24e-74772e
Authors

Adony Querubino de Andrade, José Ricardo Barboza Silva, Carla Lopes de Mendonça, Rodolfo José Cavalcanti, Jobson Filipe De Paula Cajueiro, Maria Izabel de Souza, Lilian Rose Marques de Sá, José Augusto Bastos Afonso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Animal Brasileira
#10
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,826
of 475,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Animal Brasileira
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them