You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimativa de pessoas com diagnóstico de câncer no Brasil: dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1980-5497201500060013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max Moura de Oliveira, Deborah Carvalho Malta, Heide Guauche, Lenildo de Moura, Gulnar Azevedo e Silva |
| Abstract |
To describe the profile of patients who reported a medical diagnosis of cancer and describe the most prevalent types of cancer, according to selected variables. A descriptive study that used data from the National Survey of Health, 2013, to estimate prevalence and their values of confidence interval (95%CI). Less than 2% of adults reported a medical diagnosis of cancer, with most reported by women, people over 60, among whites, residents in the village and residents of South Prostate cancer was the most reported among men and breast among women. The lowest average age of first diagnosis was identified for cervical cancer (35.4 years; 95%CI 30.3 - 40.6) and the highest for prostate (65.7 years; 95%CI 64.2 - 67.0). The findings of this study are important for the planning of health services and access, as they show differences mainly regional. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#284
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,514
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.