↓ Skip to main content

Mortality in Brazil according to gender perspective, years 2000 and 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 417)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mortality in Brazil according to gender perspective, years 2000 and 2010
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201600020010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erly Catarina de Moura, Wallace dos Santos, Alice Cristina Medeiros das Neves, Eduardo Schwarz, Romeu Gomes

Abstract

The article assessed the overall mortality in Brazil in 2000 and 2010. Data source was the Mortality Information System from Ministry of Health of Brazil. The data show the high rate of mortality among men compared to women between ages of 20 to 59 years and an expressive lower life expectancy by this population. The main groups of death were: external causes; diseases of the circulatory system, diseases of the digestive system, infectious and parasitic diseases, diseases of the respiratory system; mental and behavioral disorders; diseases of the nervous system; endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases; neoplasia and diseases of the genitourinary system. Unequal gender relations and distinct characteristics of exposure to risk factors can explain this mortality, highlighting the need to bring critical incorporation of relational gender perspective by public health policies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,575,471
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#20
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,291
of 353,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them