You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Transmissão da doença de Chagas por consumo de carne de caça: revisão sistemática
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/1980-5497201600040010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luiz Henrique Conde Sangenis, Marco Antonio Prates Nielebock, Ceumara da Silva Santos, Mateus Curty Carriello da Silva, Glauber Motta Ribeiro Bento |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 41 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#96
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,135
of 416,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them