↓ Skip to main content

Age-specific neonatal mortality and associated factors in the 2021 state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) birth cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-specific neonatal mortality and associated factors in the 2021 state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) birth cohort
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/1980-549720220038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline Lorena Kale, Sandra Costa Fonseca

Abstract

To analyze the causes of age-specific neonatal deaths and death-associated factors in the 2021 state of Rio de Janeiro birth cohort. Retrospective cohort of live births (LB) followed up to 27 days of delivery (<24hs, 1-6 and 7-27 days). Data obtained from the Information Systems on Live Births (2021) and Mortality (2021/2022). We described the distributions of maternal and newborn characteristics and causes of death. We used multinomial regression models with hierarchical levels of determination of neonatal death. Of the 179,837 LB, 274 died within 24 hours, 447 within 1-6 days and 324 within 7-27 days. The neonatal mortality rate was 5.8‰ LB (CI 95%: 5.5-6.2). Neonatal survivors and deaths were heterogeneous according to the analyzed characteristics, except for the reproductive history (p<0,05). 78% of causes of death were avoidable. Causes reducible by adequate care for pregnant women (<24 hours and 1-6 days) and newborns (7-27 days) predominated. Low schooling showed a significant association for deaths between 7-27 days (ORajusted=1.3); mixed race, for deaths between 1-6 days (ORajusted=1.3), and black color for both age groups (1-6 days: ORajusted=1.5 and 7-27 days: ORajusted=1.8). Health care and biological factors of LB (intermediate and proximal levels) remained strongly associated with neonatal death, regardless of age. Causes of death, factors associated with neonatal death, and strength of association differed according to death-specific age. Preventive actions for neonatal death should consider sociodemographic vulnerabilities and intensify adequate prenatal and perinatal care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Unknown 12 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 12 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#346
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439,986
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.