You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/1981-22562018021.170169 |
Authors |
Rodrigo D’Agostini Derech, Fabricio de Souza Neves |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 30% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
#117
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,768
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.