↓ Skip to main content

Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, April 2018
DOI 10.1590/1981-22562018021.170169
Authors

Rodrigo D’Agostini Derech, Fabricio de Souza Neves

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 30%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
#117
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,768
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.