You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minorias linguísticas, documentos biblioteconômicos e a realidade de uma biblioteca pública na Amazônia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1981-5344/3988 |
| Authors |
Soraia Pereira Magalhães |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,758,664
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
#13
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,267
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them