You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suplementos alimentares: uma fonte de doping não intencional?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1981-6723.25619 |
| Authors |
Bruno Ruiz Brandão da Costa, Márcia Nogueira da Silva de la Cruz, Rafaela Rocha Roiffé, Monica Costa Padilha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
#52
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,508
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.