You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carta do editor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1981-81222015000200001 |
| Authors |
Hein van der Voort |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,597,135
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#70
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,460
of 276,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.