↓ Skip to main content

The inexhaustible debate: social and biological causes of the demographic collapse of Amerindian populations in the sixteenth century

Overview of attention for article published in Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The inexhaustible debate: social and biological causes of the demographic collapse of Amerindian populations in the sixteenth century
Published in
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, December 2019
DOI 10.1590/1981.81222019000300012
Authors

Ricardo Waizbort

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#115
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,474
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.