You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic recurrence and molecular markers of dyslexia in the Brazilian population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista CEFAC, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1982-0216/20232528722 |
| Authors |
Thais dos Santos Gonçalves, Thais Freire, Thiago José Dionísio, Ricardo Franco de Lima, Lucimara Teixeira das Neves, Carlos Ferreira dos Santos, Patrícia Abreu Pinheiro Crenitte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista CEFAC
#107
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,826
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista CEFAC
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.