↓ Skip to main content

Response paper: Morphometric article by Mejía et al. 2015 alluding genera Herichthys and Nosferatu displays serious inconsistencies

Overview of attention for article published in Neotropical Ichthyology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response paper: Morphometric article by Mejía et al. 2015 alluding genera Herichthys and Nosferatu displays serious inconsistencies
Published in
Neotropical Ichthyology, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1982-0224-20150066
Authors

Mauricio de la Maza-Benignos, Ma. de Lourdes Lozano-Vilano, María Elena García-Ramírez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#216
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,273
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.