You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local effects of deforestation on stream fish assemblages in the amazon-savannah transitional area
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1982-0224-2021-0098 |
| Authors |
Pâmela V. Freitas, Luciano F. A. Montag, Paulo Ilha, Naiara R. Torres, Calebe Maia, Linda Deegan, Anderson Thiago Nascimento, Karina Dias Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#463
of 849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,014
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#33
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.