You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health care for women over 50: programmatic vulnerability in the Family Health Strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1983-1447.2015.02.44822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly Karine Pasqual, Maria Antonieta de Barros Leite Carvalhaes, Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Parada |
| Abstract |
To assess the health care process for women over 50 at a Family Health Unit based on the concept of programmatic vulnerability. This study is inserted in the field of health care assessments. The framework proposed by Donabedian was used to analyze 90.5% of the 790 records of women registered at the unit. It was observed that none of the women that did not have a diagnosed pathology attended the recommended consultations or underwent the recommended tests. Of the total number of women with hypertension or diabetes, 20.7% were registered in the Hiperdia Programme and less than 1.0% had attended the consultations and undergone the necessary tests. Only 11.9% of the women had had a gynaecological examination, a clinical breast examination and a mammography the year before data collection. It is concluded that women over 50 are in a situation of programmatic vulnerability in terms of the indicators established in this study. Knowledge of this reality can help nurses provide care that is best suited for this group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#179
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,027
of 281,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.