↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions about the hospital environment from the perspective of high-risk puerperal women based on Florence Nightingale's theory

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions about the hospital environment from the perspective of high-risk puerperal women based on Florence Nightingale's theory
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2015.04.51057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariane Thaise Frello Roque, Telma Elisa Carraro

Abstract

to understand the perceptions of high-risk puerperal women about the hospital environment based on Florence Nightingale's theory. High-risk postpartum period is the period of time when post-partum women care for their babies in the neonatal ICU, and experience high stress levels. it is a qualitative study with narrative approach based on Florence Nightingale's theory, conducted at a public institution in southern Brazil, from January to March 2010. Seven mothers over 18 years with newborns admitted to the neonatal ICU were the research subjects. the contextualization of their narratives, the caring environment in which they experienced this particular stage in their lives, indicates that high-risk puerperal women seek ties and support. the challenge of spending an indefinite period of time in a strange environment, away from home, with their babies under the care of health professionals, while apart from their relatives, highlights the need for nursing care during this stage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#100
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,675
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.