↓ Skip to main content

Enfrentando uma experiência difícil mesmo com apoio: a adolescente menor vivenciando a maternagemEnfrentando una experiencia difícil aunque con apoyo: el adolescente menor vivenciando la maternidad

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enfrentando uma experiência difícil mesmo com apoio: a adolescente menor vivenciando a maternagemEnfrentando una experiencia difícil aunque con apoyo: el adolescente menor vivenciando la maternidad
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2015.esp.56751
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Rosenberg de Andrade, Conceição Vieira da Silva Ohara, Regina Issuzu Hirooka de Borba, Circéa Amalia Ribeiro

Abstract

To understand the meaning of childcare for the underage adolescent mother, to reveal the demands of care and to build a theoretical model based on this experience. Qualitative research with symbolic interactionism as the theoretical framework and the grounded theory as the methodological framework; nine adolescents participated in the study. The semi-structured interview was used to collect data from September 2008 to September 2011, during paediatric nursing consultation at the Centro Assistencial Cruz de Malta, a philanthropic institution in the city of São Paulo/Brazil. Data analysis led to the construction of the theoretical model,Facing a difficult experience even with support. The experience shows that the difficulties to care for a child, even with help, are not met, only mitigated, and that underage adolescents do not have the maturity to cope with this experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 63%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#144
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,628
of 359,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.