↓ Skip to main content

Mulheres catadoras de materiais recicláveis: condições de vida, trabalho e saúde

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 235)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mulheres catadoras de materiais recicláveis: condições de vida, trabalho e saúde
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, September 2016
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.03.57321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexa Pupiara Flores Coelho, Carmem Lúcia Colomé Beck, Marcelo Nunes da Silva Fernandes, Natiellen Quatrin Freitas, Francine Cassol Prestes, Juliana Zancan Tonel

Abstract

To know the elements of work, health, and living conditions of women who pick recyclable waste and are members of a waste cooperative in a town of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. This is a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive study with seven subjects. Data were collected through participative observation, semi structured interview, and a focus group from July to August of 2013. The data were subjected to content analysis. The following thematic categories emerged: Women's work, informality and precariousness; Experiences of job satisfaction; and Working conditions and health: experiences with accidents, illness and health services. It was concluded that the women who collect recyclable material are exposed to precarious work conditions and potential health risks, such as work overload, accidents, illness, and social insecurity, and that nurses are responsible for promoting actions that ensure the health and inclusion of these workers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 23%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Engineering 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,876,021
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#42
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,468
of 330,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.