↓ Skip to main content

Revelação do diagnóstico de HIV para crianças e adolescentes: subsídios para prática assistencial

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revelação do diagnóstico de HIV para crianças e adolescentes: subsídios para prática assistencial
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, July 2017
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.esp.2016-0040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruna Pase Zanon, Cristiane Cardoso de Paula, Stela Maris de Mello Padoin

Abstract

To collectively build a guide for following-up on HIV diagnosis disclosure to children and adolescents in a specialized service. Convergent-care research approach with observation triangulation, interview and groups, conducted from May to June 2015 with seven health professionals in a pediatric outpatient clinic for infectious diseases. Thematic content analysis was developed. The discussion of understanding the disclosure, its triggers, actors involved, used strategies, and limits and possibilities listed by the professionals subsidized the construction of a guide to be applied in the stages: analyzing children's questions and curiosities; evaluating their cognitive ability; discussing the reasons to reveal; listing the professionals involved on follow-up process; including family; developing strategies for disclosure. This guide may mediate changes in care practice to ensure the child's rights and to make the professionals co-accountable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 9 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#87
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,211
of 324,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.