↓ Skip to main content

Instrumentos de avaliação do aleitamento materno e seu uso na prática clínica

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instrumentos de avaliação do aleitamento materno e seu uso na prática clínica
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2017.01.64675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bárbara Tideman Sartorio, Kelly Pereira Coca, Karla Oliveira Marcacine, Érika de Sá Vieira Abuchaim, Ana Cristina Freitas de Vilhena Abrão

Abstract

To identify breastfeeding assessment tools, their application in clinical practice, and their validation and cross-cultural adaptation. This is an integrative review of literature obtained from six databases and an online library, conducted from August 2014 to December 2015, without a temporal delimitation. We identified 19 assessment tools, of which 12 were validated and five were cross-culturally adapted. In terms of adaptation, the tools were used to assess the risk of early weaning (BAPT) and the perception/behaviour of mothers during nursing (BSES-SF and IIFAS). The identification of the available instruments and their indications for breastfeeding assessments can help health workers choose the ideal instrument, and qualify maternal and child care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 29 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Materials Science 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 30 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#79
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,339
of 324,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them