↓ Skip to main content

MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF PASSION FRUIT PLANTS FROM DIFFERENT PROPAGATION METHODS AND PLANTING SPACING

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Caatinga, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF PASSION FRUIT PLANTS FROM DIFFERENT PROPAGATION METHODS AND PLANTING SPACING
Published in
Revista Caatinga, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n206rc
Authors

JERFFSON LUCAS SANTOS, SYLVANA NAOMI MATSUMOTO, PERLA NOVAIS DE OLIVEIRA, LUAN SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA, RICARDO DE ANDRADE SILVA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Caatinga
#1
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,810
of 353,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Caatinga
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one scored the same or higher as 45 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them