↓ Skip to main content

RESENHA DE O ROMANCE QUE NUNCA FOI LIDO: HELENA , DE MACHADO DE ASSIS , DE EDUARDO LUZ

Overview of attention for article published in Machado de Assis em Linha, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 145)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RESENHA DE O ROMANCE QUE NUNCA FOI LIDO: HELENA , DE MACHADO DE ASSIS , DE EDUARDO LUZ
Published in
Machado de Assis em Linha, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/1983-68212017102210
Authors

MARTA DE SENNA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,296,667
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Machado de Assis em Linha
#36
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,882
of 437,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machado de Assis em Linha
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.