↓ Skip to main content

DEGRADAÇÃO DO VÍNCULO PARENTAL E VIOLÊNCIA CONTRA A CRIANÇA: O USO DO GENOGRAMA FAMILIAR NA PRÁTICA CLÍNICA PEDIÁTRICA

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DEGRADAÇÃO DO VÍNCULO PARENTAL E VIOLÊNCIA CONTRA A CRIANÇA: O USO DO GENOGRAMA FAMILIAR NA PRÁTICA CLÍNICA PEDIÁTRICA
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Égle Thomaz Leoncio, Sonia Regina Pereira de Souza, José Lúcio Martins Machado

Abstract

To demonstrate the importance of using the family genogram in pediatric consultation, as an analysis tool to evaluate the degradation of parental bonding and also violence against children. A qualitative study was conducted in 2011 wherein 63 children, aged between 2 and 6 years, enrolled in a slum nursery, was studied. In order to construct the genogram, data were collected in four stages: pediatric evaluation at nursery; interview with caregivers; interview with teachers; and interview with the nursery coordinator. The data about the families were used to construct the genograms with the aid of GenoPro®-2016 software. In order to evaluate the quality of bonding, the following items were included in the genograms: violence against children, drug addiction, neglect, mental disorder, type of relationship among family members. The evaluated children and their families generated 55 genograms. In 38 of them, functional family arrangements, and close or very close emotional ties were observed. In 17 cases, situations involving physical, emotional, or sexual violence against children were perceived. Among these, four represented extreme cases, with fraying parental bonding, and dysfunctional family arrangements. In these families, chemical addiction was prevalent among multiple members, as well as severe mental disorder, persistent physical and verbal abuse, and sexual abuse. The use of the genogram helps to identify at an early stage the degradation of parental bonding and violence against children, and when it is incorporated into the pediatric practice routine, it may contribute to the promotion of the comprehensive health care of the child, regardless of the presence of social vulnerability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 21%
Psychology 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#347
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,308
of 324,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.