↓ Skip to main content

ANÁLISE DOS ÓBITOS E CUIDADOS PALIATIVOS EM UMA UNIDADE DE TERAPIA INTENSIVA NEONATAL

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ANÁLISE DOS ÓBITOS E CUIDADOS PALIATIVOS EM UMA UNIDADE DE TERAPIA INTENSIVA NEONATAL
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ligia Marçola, Silvia Maria Macedo de Barbosa, Ivete Zoboli, Rita Tiziana Verardo Polastrini, Maria Esther Jurfest Ceccon

Abstract

To characterize cases of children admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary university hospital who died in the period ranging from January 01, 2012 to July 31, 2014, and who required palliative care and/or were subjected to it. A retrospective descriptive study was carried out by reviewing the medical records of these patients to collect data and to perform descriptive statistical analysis. During the study period, 49 children died after at least 48 hours from the time of admission. Of those, 18% children were extremely premature infants and 77% children had malformations. Although necessary for all of the patients in this study, palliative care was provided for only 20% of patients who died. Among the 12 babies who were not resuscitated, 33% of babies were not in palliative care. The Pain and Palliative Care Unit of the institution followed only four neonates in palliative care. These patients were using many invasive devices, had high therapeutic investment, and also altered pain scale scores. This study exhibited a large proportion of newborn infants with serious diseases and health conditions. In a few cases the patients received palliative care, but most of them were not even discussed under palliative point of view. We hope that this study will call attention to the need to propose protocols and implement training for the best treatment of these children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Other 7 14%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 17 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#347
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,308
of 324,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.