↓ Skip to main content

APRESENTAÇÃO CLÍNICA INICIAL DOS CASOS DE ERROS INATOS DO METABOLISMO DE UM HOSPITAL PEDIÁTRICO DE REFERÊNCIA: AINDA UM DESAFIO DIAGNÓSTICO

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
APRESENTAÇÃO CLÍNICA INICIAL DOS CASOS DE ERROS INATOS DO METABOLISMO DE UM HOSPITAL PEDIÁTRICO DE REFERÊNCIA: AINDA UM DESAFIO DIAGNÓSTICO
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, July 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;3;00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andressa Romão, Priscila Endlich Alves Simon, José Eduardo Coutinho Góes, Louise Lapagessede Camargo Pinto, Roberto Giugliani, Gisele Rozone de Luca, Francisca Ligia Cirilo Carvalho

Abstract

To assess the initial clinical presentation of confirmed cases of inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) at a reference facility for pediatric care. Cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study with data collection of outpatients, from January 2009 to December 2013. Inclusion criterion: referral to IEM investigation. Exclusion criterion: prior diagnosis of IEM. Analyzed variables: identification data; status of diagnostic investigation; family history of IEM; initial clinical presentation, laboratory abnormalities related to the hypothesis of IEM. Descriptive statistical methods were used in the data analysis. We included 144 patients in the study, of which 62.5% were male. The mean and median ages were, respectively, 4.3 ± 4.7 years and 2.6 years. Twelve patients (8.3%) had a confirmed diagnosis of IEM (three with aminoacidopathies, three with organic acidemias, two with urea cycle disorders and four with lysosomal storage diseases). Cognitive impairment and seizures were the initial signs and symptoms, followed by growth retardation, neuropsychomotor developmental delay, seizures and hepatomegaly. The main laboratory abnormalities in the diagnosis were hyperammonemia and metabolic acidosis. The diagnosis of IEM still creates challenges to the pediatric practice. In this study, we identified the following factors: difficulty to access specific laboratory tests, reduced number of experts and poor dissemination of knowledge among healthcare schools. The early diagnosis of IEM majorly impacts the treatment and prevention of sequelae and should be considered in the initial diagnostic hypotheses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 36%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#193
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,283
of 326,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.