↓ Skip to main content

RASTREAMENTO DE PROBLEMAS DE SAÚDE MENTAL EM CRIANÇAS PRÉ-ESCOLARES NO CONTEXTO DA ATENÇÃO BÁSICA À SAÚDE

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RASTREAMENTO DE PROBLEMAS DE SAÚDE MENTAL EM CRIANÇAS PRÉ-ESCOLARES NO CONTEXTO DA ATENÇÃO BÁSICA À SAÚDE
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;1;00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Godinho Hokama dos Santos, Eloisa Helena Rubelo Valler Celeri

Abstract

To study the applicability of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ 2,4-p) as a screening tool for mental health problems in preschoolers, in the context of Primary Health Care; to evaluate the mental health problems of the sample, comparing data from SDQ (2,4-p) and from the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL 1½-5 years). Cross-sectional observational study with a convenience sample of 31-50-month-old children, whose caretakers provided informational reports. In the first stage, professionals from the primary care health unit have applied the SDQ (2,4-p) during routine appointments. Subsequently, the CBCL (1½-5) was applied by a professional experienced in infant mental health. The SDQ and CBCL results were compared and the correlation between the scales was tested. Among 280 questionnaires available to the health professionals, 48 were filled out and the CBCL was applied to 40 of the participants. Among the problems found with the SDQ, 18 cases (37.6% out of 48) have shown abnormal score in the "Total Difficulties" and 38 (80.9% out of 48) have shown normal score in the "Impact of Difficulty". Behavioral issues were highlighted by the percentage of abnormal scores (47.9%). The correlation between SQD and CBCL was positive for all scales, except for the pro-social behavior. Clinically important mental health problems were found in preschool children. Variables of the SDQ discriminate normal and abnormal scores according to the CBCL parameters, thus functioning as a good screening tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#145
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,800
of 446,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.