↓ Skip to main content

CALCIFICAÇÃO DISTRÓFICA EM SEIO MAXILAR DE PACIENTE PEDIÁTRICO COM TRANSPLANTE HEPÁTICO E PIGMENTAÇÃO DO ÓRGÃO DENTAL

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CALCIFICAÇÃO DISTRÓFICA EM SEIO MAXILAR DE PACIENTE PEDIÁTRICO COM TRANSPLANTE HEPÁTICO E PIGMENTAÇÃO DO ÓRGÃO DENTAL
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, November 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;1;00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana Furtado de Macedo, Claudio Costa, Regina Helena Guedes da Motta Mattar, Ramiro Anthero de Azevedo

Abstract

To report a case of severe dystrophic calcification in maxillary sinus of a child with liver transplantation and dental organs pigmented by hyperbilirubinemia. female patient, 12 years old, with liver transplantation performed at the age of 7 due to extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA). The patient was receiving the immunosuppressant tacrolimus (2 mg daily). Intraoral clinical exam showed tooth green pigmentation by bilirubin. Cone-beam volumetric computed tomography (CT) was performed to verify radiographic density of pigmented dental elements. Hounsfield scale measurement did not show changes in radiographic density of dental structures. However, CT scan showed intense dystrophic calcification in the maxillary sinus region. CT scan indicated relevant radiographic findings, with radiopacity of the maxillary sinus due to fungal or non-fungal sinusitis. This case report highlights the presence of radiographic image associated with acute infectious processes that could compromise the systemic state of immunosuppressed patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 50%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#145
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,004
of 438,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.