↓ Skip to main content

IMPORTÂNCIA DA BIÓPSIA HEPÁTICA NO DIAGNÓSTICO DA DEFICIÊNCIA DE LIPASE ÁCIDA LISOSSOMAL: RELATO DE CASO

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IMPORTÂNCIA DA BIÓPSIA HEPÁTICA NO DIAGNÓSTICO DA DEFICIÊNCIA DE LIPASE ÁCIDA LISOSSOMAL: RELATO DE CASO
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, October 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;1;00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana Maria Alves De Tommaso, Flávia Fonseca de Carvalho Barra, Gabriel Hessel, Carolina Araújo Moreno, Roberto Giugliani, Cecília Amélia Fazzio Escanhoela

Abstract

To describe a case of cholesteryl ester storage disease (CESD) and discuss the importance of liver biopsy for diagnosis. A female patient, aged two years and ten months, presented with an increased abdominal volume following hepatomegaly for four months. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated hepatomegaly and hepatic steatosis. Laboratory tests showed elevated liver serum enzymes and dyslipidemia. Liver biopsy was consistent with CESD. Although measuring enzyme activity is the gold standard for CESD diagnosis, liver biopsy is very helpful when investigating suspected cases of CESD, particularly upon other differential diagnoses to be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#249
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,946
of 339,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.