↓ Skip to main content

Novidades taxonômicas para Dilleniaceae brasileiras1

Overview of attention for article published in Rodriguésia, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 245)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novidades taxonômicas para Dilleniaceae brasileiras1
Published in
Rodriguésia, March 2010
DOI 10.1590/2175-7860201061123
Authors

Claudio Nicoletti de Fraga, João Renato Stehmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#25
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,250
of 95,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them