You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chave interativa de espécies arbóreas em florestas estacionais do sudoeste da Bahia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rodriguésia, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2175-7860202071125 |
| Authors |
Inkamauta Valeda Cerda Plazas, Alessandro de Paula |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#25
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,802
of 458,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.