You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Flores-Mir, Mark R Rosenblatt, Paul W. Major, Jason P. Carey, Giseon Heo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 53% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#59
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,464
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.