You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Indirect orthodontic bonding - a modified technique for improved efficiency and precision
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.109-117.sar |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lincoln Issamu Nojima, Adriele Silveira Araújo, Matheus Alves |
Abstract |
The indirect bonding technique optimizes fixed appliance installation at the orthodontic office, ensuring precise bracket positioning, among other advantages. In this laboratory clinical phase, material and methods employed in creating the transfer tray are decisive to accuracy. This article describes a simple, efficient and reproducible indirect bonding technique that allows the procedure to be carried out successfully. Variables influencing the orthodontic bonding are analyzed and discussed in order to aid professionals wishing to adopt the indirect bonding technique routinely in their clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 24% |
Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 46 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#106
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,895
of 359,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.